Selling Dog Food? No Thanks.

Return-path: blb@uooserv.co.uk
(Authenticated sender: blb@uooserv.co.uk) by ns366832.ovh.net Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 12:09:49 +0000
From: Bill Black blb@uooserv.co.uk
Subject: Link exchange request with http://dontgimmethat.blogspot.com/
Message-id: 20110106120949.43B5CFAFF@ns366832.ovh.net>

-What? Um, why?

Hello

I am an seo consultant for http://www.urldeleted.eu (it was a pet boutique web site in Europe.)

-Yeah, um, okay, I'm not interested in other sites using my blog to sell their stuff.

We would like to exchange links with your web site http://dontgimmethat.blogspot.com/ as our sites are related by the topic pets

-Only narrowly. As in, maybe the word 'pet' was mentioned somewhere on my blog. I'm more interested in the rights of pet owners than in some muckity-muck fancy schmancy pet boutique somewhere across the ocean from me.

First of all we create a new dedicated page for your site link with a thumb image of your web site home page
Plus we also add your site link to a category page (no more than 25 sites per page) related to your site so your site is in good company
We then submit both these pages to Google for indexing using site maps each day
We also RSS feed all links to RSS aggregators for even more back links for your site

-Like, HOLY COW! I get be like FAMOUS! MY SITE, MY LITTLE SITE UP IN LIGHTS, so incredibly visible and searchable thanks to this HUGE favour! - Well, that's sure to reel me in, right?

-Uh, think again!…

We will link to your site first, and if you accept this free reciprocal link exchange offer, please click this link
as we have already prepared your details. You will see you link on our site.

-Um, thank you, no…

You will then automatically receive an email confirming your link details and our link details to be added to your site - also see our web site details below

If you wish to exchange 3 waylinks, or exchange links manually by email. Just reply to this email with your web site details; title, description, url
We can exchange reciprocal links, 3way links and deep links

-So, in order to get my site shining through and totally seen on some other sites, I must go through all this and definitely junk up my site with the sites that offer to display my site in the first place, and it isn't even a site I'm interested in? Again, no thank you.

Our site details:
Url:

-And get this, a real kicker.

http://www.mainurlnixedout.eu/pet-supplies/group/5/dog-food
Title (anchor text): dog food
Description: shop online for dog food and pet care products for house hold pets at low internet prices and fast home delivery service - (site deleted)

-Right, just another site trying to sell dog food.

-1. I don't own a dog.
2. I don't plan on it.
3. I don't live in europe.
4. So there's no way you can get any pet food fast-delivered to my house.
5. No thanks…

With best Regards

Bill Black
SEO Link Building Team
http://www.sitedeleted.eu

Link Exchange managed by - uootek link building services

y

PLEASE NOTE:

This email is not spam, it was manually sent by us, our sole purpose being to introduce ourselves to you with no obligation on your part.

-Well, it would be more than a bit obnoxious of you to expect me to do anything for you in return for your having merely contacted me with this unnecessary, unwanted offer and whether you sent it manually or not, it is spam…

Your email address was found to be publicly available on your website and it has not been added to any list. We consider this to be a polite way to contact you and apologise sincerely if you have been inconvenienced in any way.

-Not exactly inconvenienced, since I could take any old time to dissect this spam when I pleased. But it is annoying all the same. If you want to sell dog food in Europe, don't bother a blogger in North America with it.

-As for my email being visible, huh? Guess I'll have to check that out and see if there's a setting that needs to be changed. At any rate, what I've said stands.

We are obliged to offer you an 'OPT-OUT' from future mailings from us; should you wish to exercise this right, please reply with "OPT-OUT" in the subject field.

-Oh, yeah, I'll just bet! Not falling for that one, either.

-Good luck selling the dog food in Europe, I don't care how many or few people find my blog, as long as the comments they leave are worth while.

-So that goes for anyone out there. Don't try making me big promises and unappealing offers, don't tell me how awesomely cool or great or whatever my site is and then include a link to your own stupid commercial sites, hoping the flattery will butter up my ego enough so I'll let it through, thereby helping to reward your spamming in my comment areas. Don't give me this crock about my site being related to yours just because I happen to have a few entries that touch on some aspect of your business. If I want to sell stuff, it's going to be my own stuff, and I don't do the incredibly tacky and use my blog to do it.

Ebay Phishing Malware Scam

Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 21:01:30 +0100
From: "alerts@ebay.com" alerts@ebay.com
Subject: Service message
To: one of my email addresses but not the one associated with my Ebay account.
Reply-to: alerts@ebay.com

eBay sent this message to me@thewrongemailaddress.
Your registered e-mail is included to show this message originated from eBay.

-Actually, doofus, you just proved you are not Ebay and this message didn't originate from Ebay and is a scam. I didn't register with Ebay under that email address but it is one of my other email addresses.

eBay confirmation form

Dear eBay user,

-See, you don't even know my username over there. You would if you were from Ebay.

We would like to inform you that we have released a new version of eBay Confirmation form. This form is required to be completed by all eBay users.

-I call bullcrap.

Please follow these steps:

1.Open the form at http://cgi.ebay.com

-rest of url deleted. Look, Ebay doesn't have urls like that, it's obviously a malicious cgi script; and no real company sends email out telling you to click some obscure link, much less to a wrong email address.

No, I don't want your stupid malware or to give you my userid and password. Go away.

Stop "Sharing" Crap I Don't Want To Get

Return-path: RubyHaynes42@cox.net
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:24:57 +0000 (GMT)
From: Ruby RubyHaynes42@cox.net

 

-Hello Ruby Haynes

 

Subject: Shared Article: Is Working Online At Home The Next Gold Rush?

 

-Obviously not, in case you don't know yet, pyramid schemes don't work.

 

Message-id: 4A4BB809.1004878@cox.net

 

Someone wants to share this news article with you:

 

-It's not a news article, it's a malware link and I deleted it.

 

User Comment:
any ideas for making money online?

 

Source: The Business News

 

-No, go away.

No, I still don't want it.

Return-path:<SylviaToney45@attbi.com
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:15:40 +0000 (GMT)
From: Sylvia SylviaToney45@attbi.com

 

-Hello Sylvia Toney. Strange name.

 

Subject: A user has suggested an article for you to read.

 

-Yeah, I'll bet they did.

 

Message-id: 4A4A726C.1027455@attbi.com

 

Someone wants to share this news article with you:

 

-I don't want your malware so won't click your stupid link, which is deleted BTW.

 

User Comment:
lol...i didn't know people were this serious about internet money

 

Source: The Business News

 

-Yeah right. Internet money, what's that anyway? Is it any different from the stuff you use offline?

 

-In case you didn't get it, Sylvia Toney, I'm not buying it.

Another spammer wishing every female celeb would turn lesbo

Return-path: gujule@nerim.fr
From: corrie erik gujule@nerim.fr
Subject: Britney Spears and Angelina Jolie Lesbian Video.

 

Don't you stupid spammers ever learn that nobody believes that wishful thinking crap of yours? Give it up, shame on you.

The "Daily Top 10" Spam Deluge

I don't know about anyone else, but over the past couple of days, I've been receiving repeated stupid annoying emails titled "Daily Top 10 Headlines Cnn.com" or "Cnn.com Daily Top 10" - something to that effect.

 

It got so annoying and obnoxious that I finally created a rule to block anything with the offending subject line.

 

How interesting, today, my Google alerts brought up a news story about this very spam trend, and it is BAD NEWS!

 

I don't click on these stupid links in such emails as the fake Top 10s, but there are probably those who do, and that could be very bad for them.

 

UAB expert says to beware links to fake CNN headlines- al.com
http://www.al.com/business/birminghamnews/index.ssf?/base/business/1218096921165000.xml&coll=2

Bad Facebook Group, Good Facebook Group.

Bad Facebook group:

 

The evil correlation between OTAKU, Metal and meat consumption

 

Description:

 

People are social creatures, they crave acceptance and meaning. To be ignored is to not exist at all, that is why many of the social dregs will willingly associate. As was demonstrated in Fritz Lang's 'M' such voyaging for acceptance can lead to formation of evil social grouping, dedicated to immoral acts. Back then criminals, pedophiles and corrupt social guardians roamed the streets, reigning havoc amongst the righteous, the innocent the pure.

 

While we are still plagued by such social cretins our society has devolved to include greater deviants, those who indulge in Neanderthal-ic noises they label 'Metal', the pathetic who label themselves 'OTAKU', and the majority of morons who consume meat.

 

The devastation of any of these on a separate basis is cause for alarm itself, but we can see these dregs nowadays collecting together.
My dear... the humanity! The utter utter horror...

 

>>>>
Tsk Tsk
Vests, foreheads, boxes and GARs.......

 

Office: The realm of commonsense 

 

Good Facebook group:

 

The Evil Correlation Between Porn, Anti-theism and Animal Rights

 

Description:

 

People are social creatures, they crave acceptance and meaning. To be ignored is to not exist at all, that is why many of the social dregs will willingly associate. As was demonstrated in Fritz Lang's 'M' such voyaging for acceptance can lead to formation of evil social grouping, dedicated to immoral acts. Back then criminals, pedophiles and corrupt social guardians roamed the streets, reigning havoc amongst the righteous, the innocent, the pure.

 

While we are still plagued by such social cretins, our society has devolved to include greater varieties of the same deviants, those who indulge in BDSM, violent porn, promiscuous sex, hoax, rumors/malicious gossip originators, frame-ups, set-ups, police using excessive force, anti-God religions, and animal rights.

 

The devastation of any of these on a separate basis is cause for alarm itself, but we can see these dregs nowadays collecting together.
My dear... the humanity! The utter utter horror...

 

Office: The realm of reason and common sense 

Spammers are Stupid Hahahahahaha!

This site's comments tell it like it is. Lol!
http://www.cheryl-morgan.com/?p=681

Sick of Internet Trolls Whining about 'Censorship'

On the news today, there was a story about hate speech made against Muslims on the Western Standard web site http://www.westernstandard.ca but the Human Rights commission here isn't doing anything about it because they claim the internet is federally regulated, and this was a site in a western Canadian city. Bull! If they won't do anything over such a piddly technicality and someone feels threatened because some stupid hater wants them to die - and this hater living in the same city as them - what good is this human rights organization at all? The net isn't federally regulated, it isn't regulated at all, really. Go federal, and you'll surely get told that this is a municipal problem, take it up with the site owner. Or worse, you might be told to go fly a kite and get over it, because as the owner sees fit to leave the hate speech up on their site, it's their site, and they have a right to put whatever they want on it regardless of who feels threatened or gets offended, no matter how egregious the hate blither is.

 

Every time somebody behaves badly and shoots off their disgusting mouth, saying things that are incredibly stupid and hateful, scores of people rally to defend these blockheads to the hilt, but when haters say anything against a religious group or race, we are told they must be allowed to exercise their "right to free speech" bull shart! It's not free speech any more, it's ABUSE of the freedom of speech! And it's way past high time people yanked these sorry, hateful trolls off the internet altogether or at the very least, make them take the burning heat for their foul mouthed, disgusting attitudes. Only idiot trolls whine so much about "censorship" and "You're taking away my right to free speech! Waaaaaahhh!" because it's a way they know they can bully people into knuckling under and letting them get away with wishing Muslims would die or wishing Jews, Christians, etc. would die, and calling people "scum" just because they are of a different religion or ethnicity from them.

 

It's time those with any clout on the net got some guts, to do something about these haters and tell them in no uncertain terms to shut the flying hecx up!

Old Virus Hoax Learns New Trick - the Merry Christmas Virus Warning Hoax 2007 Version

HOAX!
http://www.snopes.com/computer/virus/invitation.asp

Just because a chain letter claims Snopes says it's real and provides a link,
doesn't make it so...

The 2007 "Don't Open Merry Christmas" virus chain email is a hoax that gives the
usual bogus "This is the worst virus ever, it will burn your hard drive!" and
other such hysterical claims. But in order to try looking credible so people
will pass it along without actually bothering to look it up, the chain also
provides a link to a three-year-old Snopes page about a virus from 2004. The
deal is that most people will just pass on the chain without actually checking
out the Snopes info. And no, it is not better getting any chain email 25 times
than opening a Merry Christmas message.

Outdated 2004 virus info:
http://www.snopes.com/computer/virus/zafi.asp

Snopes page on the current Merry Christmas virus warning hoax and variations of:
http://www.snopes.com/computer/virus/invitation.asp

Another Phishing Pretend Paypal Email

Return-path: angiezuizat_kecz@mninter.net
Reply-To: "PayPal Online" angiezuizat_kecz@mninter.net
From: "PayPal Online" angiezuizat_kecz@mninter.net

-Yeah right... Of course, one look at the full headers shows this isn't Paypal.

User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.0.2)
Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02
To: "kefka" kefka@isp.net, "kefka" keko@isp.net,
"kefka" email@isp.net, "kefka" kevin888@isp.net

-Oh, this is rich. So, you can't even decide which one of these is "Kefka" You
are sad, really sad.

Subject: PayPal

-No, not Paypal, actually.

Dear kefka,

-I'm not Kefka - and this just goes even further to prove you're not really
Paypal.

In accordance with our major database relocation, we are currently having
major adjustments and updates of user accounts to verify that the
informations you have provided with us during the sign-up process are true
and correct.

-How can you manage that when you can't even write a coherent English sentence?
"informations" is incorrect.

However, we have noticed some discrepancies regarding your
account at Paypal. Possible causes are inaccurate contact information and
invalid logout process.

-Actually, chude, the problem lies with you. You don't know anything about my
account, and that's a good thing.

We require you to complete an account verification procedure as part of our
security measure.
You must click the link below to complete the process.

(malicious link deleted)

-Actually no... Paypal never sends out emails requiring anyone to click a link.
This bogus email is what is known as phishing, where a spammer uses a malicious
link to try getting people's information for purposes of anything from sending
them more junk email to taking over their computer to use as a zomby spammer.

So no, chude, I don't want your malware or my computer to serve in your stupid
spamming outfit, so refuse to click your stupid link.

Unable to do so may result to abnormal account behavior during
transactions.

-Bull. Actually, clicking that link would likely result in one's computer
getting creamed and their details sold to tons of spammers all over the net.

Thank you for using PayPal!

-You're not Paypal, so I don't know why it matters to you one way or another
whether I or this fictional Kefka chude uses Paypal.

The PayPal Team

-No, you're not the Paypal team...

Blacklisted.

Spammers Are Football Fans Now?

Well, it looks as if spammers are trying to get football fans to click on their
cruddy malware sites.

Via Mailwasher I was able to look and laugh at the message w/o any harm to my
system, and then blacklist the spammer.

Return-path: YourJersey@marriagesocialist.com

-MarriageSocialist? - I'm not looking to get married, and am not a socialist or
interested in marrying one.

From: FootballJersey FootballJersey@tfqxs.marriagesocialist.com
Subject: Who is your favourite Football team

-None - as well as none of your business...

Visit-us here, if you cannot view the image below.

-Nope, chude, not interested in your malware... Site deleted.

Blacklisted.

Missing Kid Hoaxes Started by the Kids Themselves

Missing Nanaimo Teen Email is a Big Hoax

http://www.canada.com/vancouverisland/nanaimo/story.html?id=4f7749de-8e18-487b-948e-8b30bf42b78a

Furthermore, it's also a rip-off of the Evan Trembley hoax.

http://www.breakthechain.org/exclusives/evantrembley.html which was started as a
sick joke on Myspace by the real and not missing Evan Trembley himself.

It borrows content from the Ashley Flores hoax
http://www.breakthechain.org/exclusives/ashleyflores.html
which was started by one of the real and not missing Ashley's friends on Myspace
as a sick joke, and borrows heavily from the Penny Brown hoax
http://www.breakthechain.org/exclusives/pennybrown.html
which is a mutation of the Kelsey Brook Jones chain, which was true for the two
hours that kelsey was thought missing. Kelsey was found playing, and unharmed
two hours after her mother's initial panic.
http://www.breakthechain.org/exclusives/kelsey.html

http://www.breakthechain.org/missing.html

People who start hoaxes like that should be penalized, because they are getting
very sick kicks at others' expense!
It's manipulative, attention-seeking behavior on a level that is so low and
disgusting because people are getting jerked around just so a few childish teens
can get their haw-haws.

Ignorance or lack of forethought as no excuse.

Playing pranks on your friends in a social network like Myspace is bad enough,
but when it's in the form of a chain letter, it's not going to stay just among
the friends of the hoaxter. This is because your circle of friends also has
their own circles of friends, which in turn, have their own circle of friends,
so, you start a hoax about yourself as missing or dying or whatever, and your
friends might think it's funny, but somebody else who is listed as one of their
friends but not listed as your friend, looks at this friend's profile and
bulletins, and this stranger looking at your friend's profile, sees your
missing/dying hoax and assumes it's for real, and compulsively passes it along
to their friends, who pass it on to theirs.

So, yet more reasons chain letters really stink, and why starting a hoax might
get you the controll over the masses and the attention you desire, but it could
also land you and those associated with you in a pile of inconvenience if not
trouble.

I'm very sorry for anyone these hoaxes have hurt, from those who were taken in
by them, (hopefully they'll know better than pass on chain email from now on) to
those who are friends of or related to the hoaxter and suffering fallout because
of the hoax.

But as for the hoaxters themselves, I wish they would get a lot more than just a
slap on the wrist for their self-serving, inconsiderate and just plain sick
actions.

Evan Trembley was exceedingly stupid to start a hoax about himself, as was the
friend of Ashley Flores. The guy who mooched off the Trembley hoax and made it
about himself as a missing kid in Nanaimo is just as guilty. Shame on them!

Full article about the Nanaimo prank:

http://www.canada.com/vancouverisland/nanaimo/story.html?id=4f7749de-8e18-487b-948e-8b30bf42b78a

Missing Nanaimo Teen Email is a Big Hoax

Nanaimo Daily News Missing teen e-mail is a big hoax
Plea urging people to look out for Nanaimo boy is a prank that first began in
Texas
Derek Spalding , Daily News
Published: Thursday, October 11, 2007
Nanaimo RCMP say its unfortunate that someone is circulating a fake missing
person notice through e-mail accounts.

Thousands of Harbour City residents have recently received a message in their
inbox about a missing teenager from Nanaimo, but the chain mail is nothing but a
hoax. The message asks recipients to please "pass this to everyone in your
address book" in hopes that someone will have seen 15-year-old Evan Trembley.
After a simple Internet search, however, the real story behind the prank is
revealed.

Evan Trembley of Wichita, Falls, Tex, created a fake Amber Alert with himself as
the missing person. He then sent it out to his friends on MySpace.com. Then a
few people who didn't know it was a joke, sent the e-mail out to everyone on
their list. Police exposed Trembley who said he thought his "friends would
recognize it, get a laugh out of it" and delete it, he told reporters in
Wichita.

****But then people who weren't his friends took it seriously and continued to
e-mail all their friends. Trembley and his mother Tammy said they do not expect
any criminal charges.

It appears someone in Nanaimo decided to localize Trembley's prank and
distributed it throughout the city. Using the same photo and similar
information, Trembley now appears to be a missing Nanaimo boy. This week, the
e-mail reached Robin Dutton, owner of Arrowsmith Bikes, who then forwarded it to
more than 300 people on his mailing list.

"I just thought, if somebody's missing, it doesn't take a whole lot for me to
send it out to everyone in my address book," he said before expressing his
disappointment in the hoax. "I just think it's really unfortunate. I'd like to
think that people have a bit more to do rather than waste people's time."

DSpalding@nanaimodailynews.com

250-729-4231

McCann Case - Police and Media Bumbling Way Off the Map!

The police and the media are making complete idiots of themselves over the
Madeleine McCann case. I have a few comments on these site summaries.

Site 1.
McCann's hire car examined by experts
Brisbane Times - Brisbane,Queensland,Australia
A team of forensic scientists have reportedly made independent tests on a
hire car rented by the parents of missing British girl Madeline McCann. ...
http://news.brisbanetimes.com.au/mccanns-hire-car-examined-by-experts/20074630-11s5.html

-Okay, summary looks good, it's probably one of the more sensible writeups in a
while.

Site 2.
Girl in photo not Madeleine McCann
Melbourne Herald Sun - Australia
PARENTS of missing British girl Madeleine McCann were being consoled by
friends last night after being given the devastating news that a holiday
snap ...
http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,22493955-663,00.html

-The stupid media should not have splashed little Bushra's picture all over the
world and assumed she was Madeline in the first place! Not only have they wasted
a lot of people's time and attention on a claim that isn't real, they added to
the torment of Maddeleine's family! Gads, but you police and news reporters are
inconsiderate, bumbling idiots!

Site 3.
A sacked maid seeking revenge is latest suspect over missing ...
Times Online - UK
A maid who is alleged to have abducted Madeleine McCann in revenge for
being sacked from the holiday resort where the missing girl was staying is
being ...
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article2563493.ece

-Whoever came up with this hair-brained theory? Oh, right, the brain-dead police
again! Next thing you know, there will be reports that the Great Pumpkin took
her, then Santa did it, then the Easter Bunny. Please, don't waste any more time
and energy until something has been proven before spouting this unbelievable
dreck!

Site 4.
How the Portugese police say Madeleine in fall on a staircase
This is London - London,England,UK
Madeleine McCann died in a fall down a flight of stairs at her parents'
holiday apartment, Portuguese police claimed yesterday in the latest leak
from ...
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23414439-details/How+the+Portugese+police+say+Madeleine+in+fall+on+a+staircase/article.do

-Well, doesn't everybody know how reliable the Portuguese police are by now? You
stupid cops are all over the map, you have no idea what you're doing, and the
gullible media, desperate for a story, any story, truth be damned, will print
anything, not caring how it hurts the McCann family and their friends!

Site 5.
Maddy McCann My Nightmares Part 4
This Gross Nightmare About Maddy McCann with a Horrible Bloody Hand Still Keeps
Periodically Reoccurring. It Really Freaks Me Out.
http://digg.com/world_news/Maddy_McCann_My_Nightmares_Part_4

-Oh, but it's digg.com... You have to click through digg to actually get to the
article - nope, sorry, don't want to read it that badly. Anyway, for the one who
wrote it: try to calm down, okay?

Site 6.
Maid Up Stories, Avoid the Questions
By transfattyacid(transfattyacid)
If this is yet another red herring, in a week of red herrings from the McCann
camp, it does have an advantage over the Maddie in Morocco story. The matter is
being investigated by the British police, and they are unlikely to hurry any ...
http://trannyfattyacid.blogspot.com/2007/09/maid-up-stories-avoid-questions.html

-Erm, okay, so we agree about the media being bungling idiots. But I'm not sure
what your take is on the McCanns themselves.

Site 7.
If Madeleine McCann was Black, Would the Media Care?
By ExpatJane(MLH)
If Madeleine McCann was Black, Would the Media Care?Madeleine McCann, who you've
no doubt heard has been missing over in Europe, is a white British four-year-old
whose disappearance has sparked a massive global media focus. ...
http://missingminorities.blogspot.com/2007/09/if-madeleine-mccann-was-black-would.html

-What's black and white got to do with Madeleine McCann!? Oh, please, give me a
pickin break!!

The reason the world knows about Madeleine McCann at all is because of a chain
email one of her relatives started - a chain email that, for once, isn't a hoax!

-Yes, if she was black, and it was the same story and it was for real and if a
relative had started a chain email and everybody heard about it, everybody would
care just as much!

-Sheesh! Why in the heck is it that some apparently bigoted attention-hogs with
their own racist agendas always have to go throwing the race card and silly
pity-parties into things!? So now, tell me, should we all of a sudden just stop
praying that Madeleine will be found alive or at the very least, didn't suffer a
horrible death because she's not black? Should we wish she's dead because she's
not black? Should we just forget all about any other missing kids we are told
about if they happen not to be black? Should we only be on the look out for
missing kids if they are black and simply shrug off and refuse to even consider
trying to help out if a picture shows a missing kid who isn't black? Are we
supposed to only care about missing kids if they are "the right color" for you
now? Sheesh! I'm not even going to read your crummy site! This isn't about wite
and black! Stop trying to turn it into that and just please go away if you
aren't interested in helping find missing kids regardless of skin color! ARGH!

Comment on Open Thread: A photo of Madeleine McCann? by TobyRose
By TobyRose
It is odd that Kate McCann announced Madeleine had been abducted before a search
was done for her in the complex. It seems she was trying to convince people of
that. A mother's first reaction to a missing child is that the child has ...
http://crimeblog.us/?p=566#comment-64196

-Uhm no, I'd think that would be one of the initial reactions of any parent
whose kid went missing from a motel room!

[dog_anti-rescue_anti-peta_new] "owner"

To: dog_anti-rescue_anti-peta_new@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 2:53 AM

Subject: Re: [dog_anti-rescue_anti-peta_new] "owner"

Disgusting! I'll put *s around anything else I see wrong with this garbage, and it's bound to be a heck of a lot.

 

   Subject: FW: [stopthekilling] Extension of *Rights* for *Companion Animals*
    Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 09:07:36 -0700
    

        ----- Original Message -----
        From: ADLLA
        To: *Stop The Killing*

 

(self-righteous, ego-puffing, and hypocritical when humans are getting killed every day and they're not crying over that. "companion animal" is the term PEta wants to get everybody using instead of "pet" as a step to putting animals as equal with humans in order to eventually end all contact between animals and humans with the exception of themselves, of course.)

        Sent: 9/18/2007 11:48:03 Pm

 

        *POST AND CROSS POST!*

 

(Yikes! All caps = shouting, chain letter style - and this instruction's how chain email gets started, and it's very typical of animal welfare people to do this)

        Visit *www.StopTheKilling.net*

 

(offensive self-righteous looking domain, typical of animal welfare/rights egotists)
        
        In the news today, a dog *who*

 

(who is for humans, this should read "a dog that was)

 

was taken to the veterinarian's
office in the state of Georgia is being held *hostage*

 

(Implies a kidnapping which didn't happen, and since when is a dog a "hostage"? People are hostages, dogs are impounded!) until the *"owner"* (yes, the OWNER, not the mommy or daddy or guardian or care taker or steward or any other aw term, so no need for the quotes around it, dude.)
pays the *nine-hundred-dollar bill* (Holy crap! That's horrendous! The dog probably didn't even cost that much to buy in the first place, no?) owed to the vet. This is *receiving
tons of coverage in the mainstream press,* (meh...If you say so - I haven't heard of it, anyway, lots of chain letter hoaxes claim the same thing when in fact the story can be seen nowhere in the media except maybe to be exposed as a hoax.) which is discussing the
issue of *companion animals* (PETS!) *)cats, dogs, rabbits)* (Uhm dude...Er, like...Most of us know what pets are, and what kinds of pets are commonly found in households! DUH!) being given *more
standing in the law.* (which is sometimes mentioned in the media, but is still ridiculous and absolutely wrong. Animals are not and never will be little fur-people, or come before people except in the depraved minds of the animal activists who hate their own species...) As *the journalist* (Which journalist?) explaining the story stated,
*"If you took your daughter to the dentist for dental work* (This is a dog, not your daughter, a blasted dog, for crying out loud! Any journalist who attempts to equate children with animals needs to have their credentials as well as their head examined, not to mention, they just wouldn't belong in a media job!) and couldn't
pay the bill, the dentist wouldn't be able to hold your *child hostage* (Again, this is a dog, not a child! But it seems to me somebody is trying to weasel out of paying a tremendously outrageous vet bill, or a vet is trying to bilk a dog owner out of their hard earned money! It stinks either way.)
or send her to an *orphanage."* (Orphanages are for children! Dogs go to the pound or a kennel, doofus!)

Even though under our *draconian laws* (Draconian law would be forcing people to treat their animals as children and thereby end pet ownership!) animals are still *considered
someone's "personal property,"* (Obviously you have a problem with that, which makes you an ar extremist. Get a life!) there are many judges across the nation
who are apparently *awarding "companion" animals extra considerations
in dealing with issues similar to this one.* (Not because they are as sadly and scarily twisted as this, I hope, but rather, because of other factors like who's pet it is and who has a stronger case for keeping the animal - and even that's no guarantee the animal would end up where it belongs, animal welfare people are very good at stealing animals from people and using the law as a cover for their rotten activities.!) Some judges have extended
the term "personal property" in dealing with *companion animals* (They're called pets, dude...) to
"personal property *who* (Who is a human...) make a positive impression and difference in
the lives of those who own them!"* (Again, yes, people do own pets,the animals don't care what you call them, but anybody who cares to keep their own rights to be benefited by their personal property, should care, and shun your disgusting rhetoric and call it for what it is, extremist animal rights propaganda!. And yes, everybody who has ever owned and loved a pet knows pets do make a positive difference in their lives, but you animal rights nutters want to take that away, and that is the bottom line with you here!)
 
Now, of course, ADL-LA believes that animals should have intrinsic
value and be accorded *rights* (Rights is a human concept and cannot be applied to animals...) independent of their meaning to human
beings. Because *non human animals* (of course they're non human, they're animals! You're making me want to throw up!) are indeed *sentient* (Right up there on the ars favorite words for describing their idea of animals, right along with "innocent" "voiceless" and all other tripe. Give me a break!) and able to
*suffer* (As you ars continually to fantasize about, you just can't stand that somewhere, a human is happy, or that an animal and a human are happy in each other's presence! Again, get a freaking life! Yes, most of us know animals feel pain, get excited over treats, miss their owners when they're away, have foods they like and foods they dislike, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah! That does not make them little children in fur coats!) *- feel pain, fear, pleasure, disappointment, depression, etc.* (Yadda, yadda, yadda, I just covered that...) -
they *should* (No they should NOT) be  granted rights irrespective of any "human"
considerations whatsoever.

 

(Oh right. To you, a rat is a pig is a dog is a boy, and an ant should be granted the same consideration as your child since your child is of no more value to you than an ant...You pass with flying colors to be a good little soldier in the PEta/HSUS/ALF etc. army.)

 

But, in light of *how companion animals are treated* (Pets, dude, pets!) inside the *prison*
walls of LAAS and other municipal *shelters,* (the pound) this broadening of the
term "personal property"  being given by some judges is a positive
step forward. Therefore, the veterinarian in Georgia is going to
either be forced to give the dog back to the owner or make sure the
dog gets a safe and loving new home; he will NOT be allowed to send
the dog (as he had initially intended) to a *shelter* (pound) with the dog's
death the likely outcome.

 

(So...It's either a money-grubbing aw extremist vet, or a loafing animal owner looking to get something for nothing, trying to cop out of having to pay a vet bill. Yes, I hope the vet is forced to give the dog back to its owner once the bill has been paid - provided the vet was on the up and up about the amount and the owner wasn't trying to get something for nothing. It's not easy to tell which one was the villain and which one was the victim here, but either way, it's disgusting how the animal rights people are trying to use it to their own twisted interests.)

 

This issue set ADL-LA members to pondering how we can use this new and
more progressive perspective in thinking about *companion animals* (Pets!) to
serve LA's own homeless and lost animals. It seems - if we are to
agree with the many judges who are giving *companion animals* (Pets!) 'extra
consideration' - that when a  *companion animal* (Gads, I've never seen so much repitition of an offensive phrase except for the flamer who flamed somebody's guestbook with pages of the words "bitch pants" Get it through your thick head, it's PETS!) is lost, the "shelters"
(yeah, they are pounds) should be unable to kill the animal because they have an owner
somewhere. Even if the owners make no attempt or are otherwise unable
to find their missing pet, the *shelters* (pounds) should be forced either to
find this animal a home or care (humanely!) for the animal's physical
and emotional needs for the rest of his/her natural life.
 
(Gosh, for a second there, I actually thought you were going to say something truly compassionate and sensible, and say the pounds should be forced to track down the owner and give the animal back to him/her! So - you didn't say anything surprisingly and refreshingly decent after all...)

 

Furthermore, animals *who* (should be 'which' or 'that') don't have owners ("strays") are the de facto
personal property of the community in which they are found - and,
therefore, *a portion of the tax dollars (more then 22 MILLION EACH
YEAR) given to the department of Los Angeles Animal Services by the
citizens of Los Angeles should be allocated precisely to finding homes
for these animals as well, so that they can "make a positive
impression and difference" in the lives of someone else who chooses to
own them!*

 

(Who wants to shell out more money for useless taxes? people are already being taxed for more important things such as schooling and for other things they probably don't even know or care to support. And if I didn't have a pet, I should not be expected to pay taxes so some mangy flea-ridden mutts or alley cats are foisted on people who should have the right to choose to get their pets elsewhere than at some dumpy pound, and there's no way I'll support any funding to help the institutions that participate in raiding pet owners and importing sick and vicious dogs from other countries to perpetuate the animal overpopulation myth and put pet shops and breeders out of business, eventually ending pet ownership altogether, as pound pets get spewtered before they're allowed back into a home!)
 
Therefore, no *companion animal* *Blimey! Okay, I'm going through this nauseating thing to tally the number of times you churned out your favorite PEta phrase! And they are still pets!) should ever be *killed,* "(Like it or not, animals do have to be killed. If that wasn't the case, everything that moves on this planet would be living on vegetation only! And sometimes animals are killed to prevent the spread of disease, sometimes they are put down because to let them live and suffer from an incurable condition isn't doing it any favors and may be a huge finantial drain on the owner who can't afford steep vet bills every time meds are required, especially when this owner has his or her own condition they are spending lots on for meds, or if the owner has a loved one such as a child who needs special care and it isn't cheap!) *neglected,* (Pets usually aren't neglected by their owners. It's when animals end up in the pounds or the hands of other animal rights extremist raiders is when the neglect comes in to it.) or
allowed to die from treatable illnesses in our LA *shelters*

 

(pounds, and that's what pounds do, because ars working there would rather see them dead than go to live with another human.)

 

just
because they are lost or homeless. ARE THERE ANY LAWYERS OUT THERE
WILLING TO TAKE THIS ON?
 
(A smart lawyer who is not greedy, wouldn't touch this with a 30 foot pole unless it meant making the greedy animal welfare extremist pounds give the animals back to their owners every time!)

 

This to ADL-LA would be a step forward in the way Americans view
certain categories of animals - i.e., those classified as
*"companions."* (pets.) This should be a given - not something for which
activists should have to fight for, get arrested over or be
continually dragged into court.

 

-Wrong. Activists should be arrested, and dragged into court, for simply being what they are and making it their mission to cause strife wherever they go!)

 

Once we as a society are forbidden to kill *"companion" animals* (PETS!) in our
municipal *"shelters"* (pounds!) maybe - just maybe - this will pave the way for
other animals *who* (which or that!) are not considered "companions" to be given
consideration under the law as well, and NOT be *violated*

 

(Animals don't have a sense of dignity, so they cannot be violated, even if they can be hurt! The term 'violation' is connected with rights, which is a human concept alone!) *for human
greed, vanity, profit, entertainment, or culinary desires.*

 

(This passage sums up this judgemental self-righteous egomaniac animal extremist for what he/she is.Someone whose bigoted, dictator views run so deep they want to force everybody to eat only carrots, soy and greenery, even if a human hates it or is allergic - oh, but the animals can go on eating meat, right? Hypocrite! Or maybe you want to force pet owners to feed their cat a vegan diet? Hypocrite! And wear only plastic and other synthetics, even if they are not comfortable or even good for people, never see animals except in picture books and on outdated, anti-human nature programs, and all of this on pain of getting bullied and insulted as greedy, vain, etc. if one doesn't comply. And heaven forbid anyone but the animal activists be allowed to make any money! I've said it before, but will say it again, get a life, you miserable, stinking, conceited, self-agrandizing prat!)

 

ADL-LA Disclaimer: Nothing contained in this publication is intended
to encourage or incite illegal acts. Many of the reports contained in
our Action Alerts and on our web site at www.StopTheKilling.net have
been received anonymously and the Campaign cannot make any guarantees
for the accuracy of these reports.

 

-Nooooooooo kidding!!! Better not even claim to try!

 

Any views or comments stated in
reports, Action Alerts or on the web site are not necessarily the
views of STK or ADL-LA.
 
Erm, I find that very hard to believe!

 

BTW the number of repeats of a certain animal rights phrase throughout this obnoxious drivel was 8. 8 times!

 

Furkids? Isn't that calling yourself the mother of a dog? Wouldn't that be calling yourself a bitch? What does that make your sons?-------------------"Shelters" importing dogs is like the fireman w        ho sets fires so he can be a hero when he puts them out.

Re: [dog_anti-rescue_anti-peta_new] "owner"

Disgusting! I'll put *s around anything else I see wrong with this garbage, and it's bound to be a heck of a lot.

 

   Subject: FW: [stopthekilling] Extension of *Rights* for *Companion Animals*
    Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 09:07:36 -0700
    

 

        ----- Original Message -----
        From: ADLLA
        To: *Stop The Killing* (self-righteous, ego-puffing, and hypocritical when humans are getting killed every day and they're not crying over that.)
        Sent: 9/18/2007 11:48:03 PM

 

        

 

        *POST AND CROSS POST!* (Yikes! All caps = shouting, chain letter style - and this instruction's how chain email gets started, and it's very typical of animal welfare people to do this)
        Visit *www.StopTheKilling.net* (offensive self-righteous looking domain, typical of animal welfare/rights egotists)
        
        In the news today, a dog *who* (who is for humans, this should read "a dog that was) was taken to the veterinarian's
office in the state of Georgia is being held *hostage* (Implies a kidnapping which didn't happen, and since when is a dog a "hostage"? People are hostages, dogs are impounded!) until the *"owner"* (yes, the OWNER, not the mommy or daddy or guardian or care taker or steward or any other aw term, so no need for the quotes around it, dude.)
pays the *nine-hundred-dollar bill* (Holy crap! That's horrendous! The dog probably didn't even cost that much to buy in the first place, no?) owed to the vet. This is *receiving
tons of coverage in the mainstream press,* (meh...If you say so - I haven't heard of it, anyway, lots of chain letter hoaxes claim the same thing!) which is discussing the
issue of *companion animals* (cats, dogs, rabbits) (Uhm dude...Er, like...Most of us know what pets are, and what kinds of pets are commonly found in households! DUH!) being given *more
standing in the law.* (which is sometimes mentioned in the media, but is still ridiculous and absolutely wrong. Animals are not and never will be people, or come before people except in the depraved minds of the animal activists who hate their own species...) As *the journalist* (Which journalist?) explaining the story stated,
*"If you took your daughter to the dentist for dental work* (This is a dog, not your daughter, a blasted dog, for crying out loud! Any journalist who attempts to equate children with animals needs to have their credentials as well as their head examined, not to mention, they just wouldn't belong in a media job!) and couldn't
pay the bill, the dentist wouldn't be able to hold your *child hostage* (Again, this is a dog, not a child! But it seems to me somebody is either trying to get out of paying a tremendously outrageous vet bill, or a vet is trying to bilk a dog owner out of their hard earned money!)
or send her to an *orphanage."* (Orphanages are for children! Dogs go to the pound or a kennel, doofus!)

 

 
Even though under our *draconian laws* (Draconian law would be forcing people to treat their animals as children and thereby end pet ownership!) animals are still *considered
someone's "personal property,"* (Obviously you have a problem with that, which makes you an ar extremist. Get a life!) there are many judges across the nation
who are apparently *awarding "companion" animals extra considerations
in dealing with issues similar to this one.* (Not because they are as sadly and scarily twisted as this, I hope, but rather, because of other factors like who's pet it is and who has a stronger case for keeping the animal!) Some judges have extended
the term "personal property" in dealing with *companion animals* (They're called pets, dude...) to
"personal property *who* (Who is a human...) make a positive impression and difference in
the lives of those who own them!"* (Again, yes, people do own pets,the animals don't care what you call them, but anybody who cares to keep their own rights to be benefited by their personal property, should care, and shun your disgusting rhetoric and call it for what it is, extremist animal rights propaganda!. And yes, everybody who has ever owned and loved a pet knows pets do make a positive difference in their lives, but you animal rights nutters want to take that away, and that is the bottom line with you here!)
 
Now, of course, ADL-LA believes that animals should have intrinsic
value and be accorded *rights* (Rights is a human concept and cannot be applied to animals...) independent of their meaning to human
beings. Because *non human animals* (of course they're non human, they're animals! You're making me want to throw up!) are indeed *sentient* (IRight up there on the ars favorite words for describing their idea of animals, right along with "innocent" "voiceless" and all other tripe. Give me a break!) and able to
*suffer* (As you ars continually to fantasize about, you just can't stand that somewhere, a human is happy, or that an animal and a human are happy in each other's presence! Again, get a frickin life! Yes, most of us know animals feel pain, get excited over treats, miss their owners when they're away, have foods they like and foods they dislike, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah! That does not make them little children in fur coats!) *- feel pain, fear, pleasure, disappointment, depression, etc.* (Yadda, yadda, yadda, I just covered that...) -
they *should* (NOT) be  granted rights irrespective of any "human"
considerations whatsoever.

 

(Oh right. To you, a rat is a pig is a dog is a boy, and an ant should be granted the same consideration as your child since your child is of no more value to you than an ant...You pass with flying colors to be a good little souldier in the PEta/HSUS/ALF etc. army.)

 

But, in light of *how companion animals are treated* (Pets, dude, pets!) inside the *prison*
walls of LAAS and other municipal *shelters,* (the pound) this broadening of the
term "personal property"  being given by some judges is a positive
step forward. Therefore, the veterinarian in Georgia is going to
either be forced to give the dog back to the owner or make sure the
dog gets a safe and loving new home; he will NOT be allowed to send
the dog (as he had initially intended) to a *shelter* (pound) with the dog's
death the likely outcome.

 

(So..It's a money-grubbing aw extremist vet, then. Yes, I hope he/she is forced to give the dog back to its owner!)

 

This issue set ADL-LA members to pondering how we can use this new and
more progressive perspective in thinking about *companion animals* (Pets!) to
serve LA's own homeless and lost animals. It seems - if we are to
agree with the many judges who are giving *companion animals* (Pets!) 'extra
consideration' - that when a  *companion animal* (Gads, I've never seen so much repitition of an offensive phrase except for the flamer who flamed somebody's guestbook with the words "bitch pants" Get it through your thick head, it's PETS!) is lost, the "shelters"
(yeah, they are pounds) should be unable to kill the animal because they have an owner
somewhere. Even if the owners make no attempt or are otherwise unable
to find their missing pet, the *shelters* (pounds) should be forced either to
find this animal a home or care (humanely!) for the animal's physical
and emotional needs for the rest of his/her natural life.
 
(Gosh, for a second there, I actually thought you were going to say something truly compassionate and sensible, and say the pounds should be forced to track down the owner and give the animal back to him/her! So - you didn't say anything surprisingly and refreshingly decent after all...)

 

Furthermore, animals *who* (should be 'which' or 'that') don't have owners ("strays") are the de facto
personal property of the community in which they are found - and,
therefore, *a portion of the tax dollars (more then 22 MILLION EACH
YEAR) given to the department of Los Angeles Animal Services by the
citizens of Los Angeles should be allocated precisely to finding homes
for these animals as well, so that they can "make a positive
impression and difference" in the lives of someone else who chooses to
own them!* (Who wants to shell out more money for useless taxes? people are already being taxed for more important things such as schooling and for other things they probably don't even know or care to support. And if I didn't have a pet, I should not be expected to pay taxes so some mangy flea-ridden mutts or alley cats are foisted on people who should have the right to choose to get their pets elsewhere than at some dumpy pound, and there's no way I'll support any funding to help the institutions that participate in raiding pet owners and importing sick and vicious dogs from other countries to perpetuate the animal overpopulation myth and put pet shops and breeders out of business, eventually ending pet ownership altogether, as pound pets get spewtered before they're allowed back into a home!)
 
Therefore, no *companion animal* *Blimey! Okay, I'm going through this nauseating thing to tally the number of times you churned out your favorite PEta phrase! And they are still pets!) should ever be *killed,* "(Like it or not, animals do have to be killed. If that 3wasn't the case, everything that moves on this planet would be living on vegetation only! And sometimes animals are killed to prevent the spread of disease, sometimes they are put down because to let them live and suffer from an incurable condition isn't doing it any favors and may be a huge finantial drain on the owner who can't afford steep vet bills every time meds are required, especially when this owner has his or her own condition they are spending lots on for meds, or if the owner has a loved one such as a child who needs special care and it isn't cheap!) *neglected,* (Pets usually aren't. It's when animals end up in the pounds or the hands of other animal rights extremist raiders is when the neglect comes in to it.) or
allowed to die from treatable illnesses in our LA *shelters* (pounds, and that's what pounds do, because ars working there would rather see them dead than go to live with another human.) just
because they are lost or homeless. ARE THERE ANY LAWYERS OUT THERE
WILLING TO TAKE THIS ON?
 
(A smart lawyer who is not greedy, wouldn't touch this with a 30 foot pole unless it meant making the pounds and greedy animal welfare extremist vets give the animals back to their owners every time!)

 

This to ADL-LA would be a step forward in the way Americans view
certain categories of animals - i.e., those classified as
*"companions."* (pets.) This should be a given - not something for which
activists should have to fight for, get arrested over or be
continually dragged into court.

 

-Wrong. Activists should be arrested, and dragged into court, for simply being what they are and making it their mission to cause strife wherever they go!)

 

Once we as a society are forbidden to kill *"companion" animals* (PETS!) in our
municipal *"shelters"* (pounds!) maybe - just maybe - this will pave the way for
other animals *who* (which or that!) are not considered "companions" to be given
consideration under the law as well, and NOT be *violated* (Animals don't have a sense of dignity, so they cannot be violated, even if they can be hurt! The term 'violation' is connected with rights, which is a human concept alone!) *for human
greed, vanity, profit, entertainment, or culinary desires.* (This passage sums up this judgemental self-righteous egomaniac animal extremist for what he/she is.Someone whose bigoted, dictator views run so deep they want to force everybody to eat only carrots, soy and greenery, even if a human hates it or is allergic - oh, but the animals can go on eating meat, right? Hypocrite! Or maybe you want to force pet owners to feed their cat a vegan diet? Hypocrite! And wear only plastic and other synthetics, even if they are not comfortable or even good for people, never see animals except in picture books and on outdated, anti-human nature programs, and all of this on pain of getting bullied and insulted as greedy, vain, etc. if one doesn't comply. And heaven forbid anyone but the animal activists be allowed to make any money! I've said it before, but will say it again, get a life, you miserable, stinking, conceited, self-agrandizing prat!)

 

ADL-LA Disclaimer: Nothing contained in this publication is intended
to encourage or incite illegal acts. Many of the reports contained in
our Action Alerts and on our web site at www.StopTheKilling.net have
been received anonymously and the Campaign cannot make any guarantees
for the accuracy of these reports.

 

-Nooooooooo kidding!!! Better not even claim to try!

 

Any views or comments stated in
reports, Action Alerts or on the web site are not necessarily the
views of STK or ADL-LA.
 
Erm, I find that very hard to believe!

 

BTW the number of repeats of a certain animal rights phrase throughout this obnoxious drivel was 8. 8 times!

 

Furkids? Isn't that calling yourself the mother of a dog? Wouldn't that be calling yourself a bitch? What does that make your sons?-------------------"Shelters" importing dogs is like the fireman w        ho sets fires so he can be a hero when he puts them out.

Not Cool!

Return-path: cedric@mialaret.com

-Not cool. The name 'Cedric' shouldn't appear anywhere in any part of a
spammer's identity.

From: "Robert Bravo" me@myisp.com
Reply-To: "Robert Bravo" me@myisp.com

-Robert Bravo? Robber Boo-Hiss more likely! Definitely not, not, not, NOT COOL
forging my address!!!

Subject: Make a gift for your wife

-I'm a girl, you idiot!

At Our Store, we specialize in the sales of
brand name quality look alike timepieces,

(Snip rest of advertising babble)

-Dude: if you think I'm going to promote your cruddy web site and buy phony
status watches at your cruddy store after you forged my address, you need your
head examined - with an application of a combo of itching and sneezing powder!

Thank you,

-You forged my address. You're not welcome!

Amr Mapara

-Huh? But I thought you said your name was Robert Bravo?

Click to be removed. You will be removed within 6 8 Hours

-Bull!

-Buh-bye Robert Amr Mapara Boo-Hiss!

Blacklisted!

I'm Shawn Gregorio Today.

Return-path: wneknowhow@foto-hailer.de
Reply-To: "GSimon Sonia" wneknowhow@foto-hailer.de
From: "GSimon Sonia" wneknowhow@foto-hailer.de
Subject: hello

-Hello GSimon Sonia.

To: sanju100@isp.org, santa@isp.org, me@isp.org
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 03:11:35 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

Hey Shawn

-So I'm Shawn now. Lol. Okay, I can handle that, it's a girl's name as well as a
guy's.

Trading Alert for tomorrow,
ticker-chvc
See all the volume, GET IN

Faye

-Wait a minute, I thought you said you were GSimon Sonia?

-Well, Faye Sonia G Simon, I couldn't care less about your trading alerts.

Bye.

Blacklisted.

Return-path: waparvenu@dbass1.fsnet.co.uk
Reply-To: "Abe Caudill" waparvenu@dbass1.fsnet.co.uk
From: "Abe Caudill" waparvenu@dbass1.fsnet.co.uk
Subject: hey mate

-Hello Abe Caudill.

To: omar@isp.org, fred@isp.org, me@isp.org, ger@isp.org

yo Gregorio

-So now I'm...Gregorio? *Rolling eyes* I liked "Shawn" better.

Leader for this week,
call-chvc
This is an easy tripler

Andre

-No Abe Andre Caudill, I already told your friend Fae Sonia G Simon I wasn't
interested in your precious chvc, so you can't do anything to change my mind
either.

-Bye.

Blacklisted.

The Depths of Desperation Spammers Will Go

"I'll tell my spammer friends to stop spamming you if you put a link to my site
on yours."

No kidding, that's what this sorry jerk is proposing according to these
articles.

This Guy Will Ask Spammers To Stop...
WebProNews - Lexington,KY,USA
I know a lot of spammers and I will ask them not to post on your site. It
will reduce the volume of spam by 30-50% .In return Id like to ask you to
put a ...
http://www.webpronews.com/blogtalk/2007/09/05/this-guy-will-ask-spammers-to-stop-spamming-you

Trust me, I KNOW spammers...
By xinit
I know a lot of spammers and I will ask them not to post on your site. It will
reduce the volume of spam by 30-50% .In return Id like to ask you to put a link
to my site on the index page of your site. The link will be small and your ...
http://foo.ca/wp/2007/09/05/trust-me-i-know-spammers/
bankrupt artist v.3

Comment on This Guy Is The Friend of Spammers! He Will Ask Them To ...
By Caydel
Somehow, it appears I managed to post it first... w00t! Although,

http://www.altogetherdigital.com/20070905/blog-spammers-offer-protection-services-thank-god-for-askimet/

has the best write up.
http://feeds.sphinn.com/~r/sphinncomments/~3/152628346/4678
Sphinn: Comments

What Will Blog Spammers Think Of Next
By WICKO
if you have a blog, you see the daily comment spam, but have you ever received
this kind of offer.
http://blog.linkworth.com/what-will-blog-spammers-think-of-next/

* * *

Full article:

hello , my name is Richard and I know you get a lot of spammy comments ,
I can help you with this problem . I know a lot of spammers and I will ask them
not to post on your site. It will reduce the volume of spam by 30-50% .In return
Id like to ask you to put a link to my site on the index page of your site. The
link will be small and your visitors will hardly notice it , its just done for
higher rankings in search engines. Contact me icq 454528835 or write me
tedirectory@yahoo.com , i will give you my site url and you will give me yours
if you are interested. thank you

* * *

No deal, Rick, dude! I'm not spamming my own site with your link, and I don't
want anyone telling me what to put on my sites for any reason or in exchange for
anything. And if you know a lot of spammers and personally can contact them,
then why the heck aren't you really doing something to help isps rid the
internet of them? Doesn't say much for your own character, does it, hmmmm?

You're a spammer yourself, and if anything, in competition with the others.

Besides, if I refuse to put your lousy link up on my site, you could always do
the opposite of what you promise and actually spam on your own or get other
spammers to spam, which I have full confidence you would be petty enough to do.

So forget it, I'm not buying that load of rotten potatoes from you.

I'll just laugh at your pathetic attempt at boosting your ego by trying to get
the highest rankings in search engines. You have no life. I suggest you get one,
quick!

Secret Watches?

Return-path: <j@nucleus.com>
From: "Sarah" j@nucleus.com

-Hello Sarah J

Subject: No one has to know about our little secret.

-What little secret? Not that it matters, this subject line is a huge laugh
considering you probably spammed massive numbers of isps with your "little
secret" doesn't that make it, uhm, no longer a secret, hmm?

Do you have a special date coming up?

-Such as?

Maybe a wedding, anniversary or the birthday of your 15 year-old daughter...

-yeah, though the wedding is my niece's and it's only happening next year. Her
birthday, and that of my sister (her aunt) is coming up, and my mom's a month
later, why?

These are the perfect times to give them themost unforgettable gift of all:

-Okay, hold up - what is a "themost" and what makes it different from other
unforgettable gifts?

JEWELS and WATCHES.

-You've got to be kidding right? This was your little secret? Selling fake
Rolexes? Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

-Lousy web site deleted.

Nothing says "I love you" better than a 2 thousand dollar watch,

Chick, if that's what you think, you are sad.

BUT you will not pay that much.

-That's right, because I'm not buying a watch from you or any of your spammer
pals.

Because there is a handmade replica place just for you, all widely-known brands
and models.
For girlfriends, boyfriends, husbands and wives.
With our promotion you can even get one for your mother-in-law!

-Wow, that's some little secret!

-I told your pals, Marlon and Kathy I think it was, I wasn't interested in their
replica watches, and the same goes for you.

GET THE PROMOTION YOU'VE BEEN WAITING FOR!

Augh! *Runs to find something to stop ears and eyes from bleeding* Do you have
to shout so loud!? Anyway, you didn't think I'd delete your stupid site if you
put it in this email twice, did you? But I did. I'm not interested in any
promotions from you, nor will I promote you, except maybe as a nominee for the
president of the pea-brain section of the Dimwit Club.

Have a nice Day!

-Too bad I can't wish you the same.

Blacklisted.